|
Return to Contents in this
Issue |
|
Original Article |
|
|
|
Epidemiological factors on Hymenoptera venom allergy in
a Spanish adult population |
|
|
|
L. A. Navarro, Aa.
Peláezb,
F. de la Torrec,
J. Mª Tenias Burillod,
J. Megíase,
I. Martínezf |
|
a Unidad de Alergia. Servicio de
Medicina Interna. Hospital de Xàtiva (Spain) -
b Servicio de Alergia. Hospital Clínico Universitario.
Avda. Blasco Ibáñez, 17, 46010 Valencia (Spain) -
c ALK-ABELLÓ , S.A. Miguel Fleta, 19, 28037 Madrid,
Spain -
d Dpto. Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Lluis Alcanys,
Xàtiva (Spain) -
e Dpto. Médico Ford España, Valencia (Spain) -
f Servicio de Medicina Intena. Hospital de Xàtiva (Spain). |
|
J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol
2004; Vol. 14(2): 134-141 |
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
Background:
The prevalence and
risk factors of
hymenoptera venom
allergy (HVA) have
been studied in
several countries.
However, there are
few studies on the
general population
and these have very
variable results.
Methods: An
observational,
prospective and
cross-sectional
study was carried
out on a sample of
1064 subjects in a
total working
population of 7887
subjects (Ford
factory, Spain) in
order to know the
prevalence of HVA in
this population and
the influence of
several risk factors
in its development.
Results: The
rate of exposure to
stings was 84.1 % (ci
95 %: 81.8 – 86.3
%). The prevalence
of HVA was 7.6% (ci
95 %: 6.1 – 9.4%),
with local severe
reactions (LSR) in
5.3% (ci 95 %: 4 –
6.8%) and systemic
reactions (SR) in
2.3% (ci 95 %: 1.5 –
3.4%). More than 82
% of individuals
over 20 years had
already had some
exposure, a figure
that did not change
in the age groups of
older decades. In
our study, the
prevalence of HVA
was not dependent on
either age (similar
age in all groups),
sex: for LSR OR 2.75
(ci 95 %: 0.37 –
20.30), for SR OR
0.54 (ci 95 %: 0.12
– 2.38), or atopy OR
0.96 (ci 95 %: 0.50
–1.83); SR being
more frequent among
the residents of
rural habitats, with
ranges approaching
statistically
significant levels
OR 2.15 (ci 95 %:
0.95-4.81). The
number of stings was
larger in HVA group
with respect a
control group. The
degree of venom
sensitization
measure by skin test
and CAP-RAST was
more intensive in SR
group versus LSR
group. Among vespids,
sensitization to
Polistes was more
frequent than
Vespula.
Conclusions:
HVA in our sample
has a similar
prevalence to other
countries located in
similar geo-climatic
environments. Rural
habitat and the
number of stings
suffered along life
are risk factors of
HVA development.
Key words:
Hymenoptera Venom
Allergy, prevalence,
risk factors,
Spanish population. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|